![]() ![]() The response has been that empirical data does not often form a consistent whole, and that truth should not be used in contexts where consistency fails. On the whole, coherence theories have been criticized as lacking justification in their application to other areas of truth, especially with respect to assertions about the natural world, empirical data in general, assertions about practical matters of psychology and society, especially when used without support from the other major theories of truth. ![]() A claim like this needs to be qualified by the observation that formal reasoners are content to contemplate axiomatically independent but mutually contradictory systems side by side, for example, the various alternative geometries. ![]() Some versions of coherence theory have been claimed to characterize the essential and intrinsic properties of formal systems in logic and mathematics. Coherence theories in specialized domains Exponents of this view infer that the most complete truth is a property solely of a unique coherent system, called the absolute, and that humanly knowable propositions and systems have a degree of truth that is proportionate to how fully they approximate this ideal.(Baylis 1962). Others of this school of thought, for example, Brand Blanshard, hold that this whole must be so interdependent that every element in it necessitates, and even entails, every other element. In this view, a proposition is true to the extent that it is a necessary constituent of a systematically coherent whole. Joachim, truth is a systematic coherence that involves more than logical consistency. To state it in the reverse, that "truth" exists only within a system, and doesn't exist outside of a system.Īccording to another version of coherence theory, championed especially by H.H. However, coherence theories of truth do not claim merely that coherence and consistency are important features of a theoretical system - they claim that these properties are sufficient to its truth. Ideas like this are a part of the philosophical perspective known as theoretical holism (Quine & Ullian 1978).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |